The IETT's bid for the maintenance and repair of the 55 elevator and 27 escalator in the metrobus line was a crisis. The company won the bid with the 2 million 627 thousand pounds bid and the company information on the appeal of the claim made by the GCC, the company was excluded from the tender.
According to Özlem GÜVEMLİ, Süzcü, IETT launched the tender on 14 February 2018 for the lifts and escalators which are frequently used by hundreds of thousands of Istanbul residents, especially elderly people, children and disabled citizens. 55 passenger elevator on the Metrobus line, 27 escalator 18 8 500 654 XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX XNUMX
The tender was awarded to Kone Asansör Sanayi Ticaret A.Ş., the owner of the 2 million 627 thousand 686 TL bid. However, Ansava Mühendislik -Erdem Engineering-Sıtran Karabil Business Partnership complained to the Public Procurement Board (GCC). 2 million 627 thousand 686 TL complaint application is not possible to do the job, the specification stated that the total 408 work item. Furthermore, the Trade Registry Gazette, which shows the last status of the legal entity, the partners, members or founders of the legal entity, together with the notarized signature circular in the tender dossier, or the documents indicating the information, were defended.
WINNING COMPANY EXCEPT EVALUATION
Evaluating the complaint, the JCC determined that there were a number of contradictions in the tender and decided that this could be corrected by the corrective action. The JCC decided that the proposal of Kone Elevator Industry and Trade Inc. would be excluded from the evaluation and the procurement proceedings after this stage would be reinstated in accordance with the legislation.
OVERVIEW OF THE LOWER OFFER IS NOT HEALTHY
At the beginning of the practices contrary to the legislation determined by the JCC decision, there was an extremely low offer. According to the legislation in the JCC decision, by the administrations of the components considered important in the proposal, the bid is below the limit value of the tenderers should be asked to explain the explanation. However, in the extremely low offer inquiry letter sent by IETT, it was stated that transportation costs, tax, insurance, painting and mortgage expenses, GCC share expense and tender contract expenses components should be explained without any significant cost factors. When the technical specifications are examined, it is emphasized that IETT does not determine the important offer components according to the cost elements by emphasizing that there are many items such as labor cost, SCADA system, cleaning material, equipment, tool, tool cost and expenses to be made for calibration. In this context, it was concluded that it is not possible to make a healthy evaluation of extremely low inquiries.
Kone Elevator San. and Tic. Inc. When the relevant documents submitted by the administration and submitted by the administration were examined, the JCC, which concluded that the partner's trade name information was not included in the proposal file, decided to exclude the proposal from the evaluation.
Source : www.sozcu.com.tr